A Q&A with Figma’s VP of Product | Figma Blog (opens in new tab)
Figma VP of Product Yuhki Yamashita describes FigJam as a response to how customers and Figma employees adapted collaboration during the shift to remote work. He argues that design, engineering, and product roles are becoming more collaborative and less ownership-driven. FigJam supports this by providing an informal space for exploration, brainstorming, and human interaction before ideas become polished interfaces in Figma.
Why Figma Built FigJam
- Figma observed users stretching the product beyond interface design.
- During the early pandemic, customers used Figma for:
- Brainstorming
- Team warm-ups
- Social events
- Other offline activities moved online
- Figma’s own transition to remote work reinforced the value of gathering in a shared virtual space.
- FigJam emerged to support these broader collaboration needs.
Design and Product Work Is Becoming More Collaborative
- Design teams are riffing together more frequently.
- People outside design are joining earlier in the development process.
- Figma and FigJam links are increasingly shared across organizations for everything from copy edits to major product changes.
- The boundaries between engineering, design, and product management are becoming less rigid.
- Collaboration is shifting away from role-based ownership toward collective problem-solving.
The Changing Role of Product Managers
- Product managers and designers have always had overlapping responsibilities, but previously lacked shared tools for exploration.
- Design files were once treated as belonging primarily to designers, making edits from PMs feel intrusive.
- Today, product development is viewed more as a shared endeavor.
- PM and design roles are increasingly interdependent.
Designing Through “The Mess”
- Design is nonlinear and requires repeated exploration, iteration, evaluation, and revision.
- Teams may abandon ideas early or develop them significantly before seeking new perspectives.
- Effective tools should support multiple levels of engagement:
- Zooming into detailed work
- Stepping back to evaluate broader direction
- Figma and FigJam together create a more fluid workflow from ideation through development.
When to Use FigJam Instead of Figma
- FigJam is best for ambiguous, early-stage work.
- It supports:
- Brainstorming
- Mapping
- Gathering reactions or “temperature checks”
- Exploring ideas before they become interface designs
- Figma is more appropriate when teams begin building and refining a concrete interface.
Making Meetings More Expressive
- Yamashita values FigJam’s informal and expressive character.
- Unlike polished, linear shared documents, FigJam emphasizes collaborative problem-solving over status updates.
- Cursor chats, emojis, and stickers let people respond naturally without interrupting or formally speaking.
- Ephemeral interactions can communicate emotions such as laughter or encouragement without creating a permanent record.
- These features help make remote meetings feel more human and can change the tone of collaboration.
Future Development
- Users are applying FigJam to many workshops and collaborative exercises.
- Figma sees opportunities to improve facilitation for these activities.
- Features such as the timer are examples of efforts to make workshops easier to run.
FigJam is positioned as a flexible space for early exploration and shared participation, complementing Figma’s more structured interface-design workflow. Teams should use it to embrace uncertainty and involve broader groups before committing to polished solutions.