Press Start: How Controllers Shaped Video Game Design—and Where Interfaces May Go Next | Figma Blog
Video game interfaces evolved from simple start screens into complex systems of menus, maps, inventories, and customization. Yet the controller’s directional inputs and buttons have remained a consistent foundation, shaping navigation patterns and preserving players’ muscle memory. The article argues that understanding how input devices define interfaces will be essential as AR, VR, and other technologies introduce new ways to interact with digital worlds. ## From Simple Screens to Complex Game Hubs - Early games such as *Tennis for Two*, *Pong*, *PAC-MAN*, and *Super Mario Bros.* offered minimal interfaces, often requiring only a coin insertion or a start button. - Modern AAA games support many features, including: - Multiple game modes - Character customization - Cosmetics stores - Maps and inventories - Quests and settings - These features have transformed games into interconnected hubs of screens, menus, and tabs. - The growth of gaming has helped make it a major cultural and economic industry, supported by livestreaming, esports, and Olympic recognition. ## Controllers as a Design Foundation - From the Atari 2600 to the PlayStation 5, controllers have consistently combined directional controls with buttons. - This consistency allows players to transfer familiar muscle memory between generations of games. - Established controller conventions create predictable navigation patterns for players. - Designers and developers benefit from these conventions because they reduce the need to create entirely new interaction models for every game. ## The Input Defines the Interface - Every platform has a dominant input method that shapes its interface: - Desktop: mouse - Mobile: fingers and touch gestures - Television: remote controls - Mouse interfaces can use small, dense controls because the pointer is fast and precise. - Touch interfaces require larger, more widely spaced controls because fingers are less precise than cursors. - Mobile design also takes advantage of gestures such as tapping, swiping, and pinching. - The article’s broader point is that interface design must reflect the physical capabilities and limitations of the device used to navigate it. ## Preparing for New Forms of Interaction - Game interfaces increasingly connect 2D navigation systems with 3D worlds. - AR and VR controllers may allow players to engage with their physical surroundings as well as digital environments. - As input methods evolve, designers will need to rethink how people move through interfaces, rather than simply adapting existing controller-based patterns. The practical recommendation is to treat input as a core design constraint. By studying how controllers shaped game navigation—and how emerging technologies change physical interaction—designers can build interfaces that feel intuitive across future platforms.
Read original(opens in new tab)